Laetoli footprints came from present-day humans, but they lived millions of years ago. In fact, a number of other findings trace the origin of modern humans 1.7 million years ago. One of the most important findings is the footprints found at Laetoli, Tanzania by Mary Leakey in 1977. Footprints was found in the layer which, according to calculations 3.6 million years old. More importantly, the footprints are not different from the footprints left by modern humans (humans today). The footprints found in Mary Leakey and studied several such paleoanthropologist Don Johanson and Tim White. The result is the same. White writes: No doubt ... Traces were similar to modern human footprints. If one traces it left on the sand beaches of California now, and a four-year-old child was questioned about it, he would immediately reply that someone had walked in there. He will not be able to distinguish it with a hundred other footprints on the beach, so did you. After examining the footprints, Louis Robbins from the University of North Carolina this review: curve a bit higher - the smaller human berlengkungan taller than me-and big toes and legs parallel to the index finger. ... The fingers pressing the ground like the fingers human foot. You will not see this in animals. Morphological forms of tests continued to show again that tracks must be accepted that the human footprints, further, that modern humans have today (Homo sapiens). Russell Tuttle to learn this writing:
A small barefoot Homo sapiens may have made ... Of all the observed morphological features, the feet of people who make the tracks not unlike the human foot modern.Penelitian not neutral about the footprints that reveal actual owners. In fact, the footprints consisted of 20 fossilized tracks of a modern man aged 10 years and 27 traces of a younger man. They obviously modern humans like us.
This situation made the Laetoli footprints as conversation material for years. The evolutionist paleoanthropologist working hard because they think an explanation is difficult to accept the fact that modern man has walked on earth 3.6 million years ago. In the 1990s, "explanation" is taking shape. Evolutionists decided that these footprints must have been left by Australopithecus, because according to their theory, it is impossible there homo species 3.6 million years ago. However, in his essay in 1990, Russell H. Tuttle wrote: In short, the footprints 3.5 million years old at the Laetoli site G resemble modern humans trace of the usual bare-foot. There are no features that indicate that Laetoli-capable bipedal hominid that is less than us. If only traces in the G site is not known that old, we would immediately conclude that the trail had been made by members of the genus Homo ... In this case, we must set aside a weak assumption that the Laetoli impressions made by the Lucy species, Australopithecus aferensis.Dengan ie in other words, the footprints 3.6 million years old this may not belong to Australopithecus. The only reason why these tracks are considered to be derived from it because it is located on the volcanic layer of 3.6 million years old. Was considered to belong to Australopithecus trail with the assumption that human beings can not exist in the days of old.
Interpretations of the Laetoli tracks shows us a very important fact. Evolutionists do not support his theory in light of scientific findings, instead just ignore it. Here we have a theory that is defended blindly, and the dubious theory of all findings were ignored or twisted to support the theory. In short, the theory of evolution is not science, but dogma kept alive by ignoring science.
Human jaw 2.3 Million Years of Age
Another example that shows the clack-sahihan genealogy Authored by evolutionists: the jaw of modern humans (Homo sapiens) 2.3 million years old. Jaw is coded AL 666-1 was unearthed in Hadar, Ethiopia. Evolutionist publications are trying to reduce its meaning to refer to them as "a very surprising finding." (D. Johanson, BlakeEdgar, From Lucy to Language, p. 169)
